Deeyan

neki novega glede DPF-a DPF Removal to Become an MOT Failure The MOT test for diesel vehicles is changing from February 2014. All diesel cars originally fitted with a Diesel Particulate Filter (DPF) must have the DPF in place and operational during the MOT test. It if is missing then the vehicle will fail the test. The current test only examines emissions but now technicians will have to check the filter is still present too. What we don’t yet know is if this includes modified units? For example, many companies just gut the internals but the original DPF remains. Our guess is that the vehicle would still pass on the visual inspection. Some claim that removal is illegal citing that it contravenes the Road Vehicles (Construction and Use) Regulation 61 A, as it no longer meets emission standards applied to it when new. However, this is not always the case as there is growing evidence that DPF removal can lower emissions and even the hydrocarbon count. There are also many responsible owners that have chosen the have the DPF removed on their car whilst using a combustion catalyst to lower HCs further. The result is an engine that outputs less HC than when it had the original DPF fitted. Besides, have you ever been driving behind a diesel car that is going through a regeneration cycle? What is coming out the exhaust?! Then there is the substantial power MPG increases to be had. The Minister for roads, Robert Goodwill quoted: “I am very concerned that vehicles are being modified in a way that is clearly detrimental to people’s health and undoes the hard work car manufacturers have taken to improve emissions standards. “This change to the MOT tests makes it clear ? if you have this filter removed from your car it will fail the test.” A spokesperson from the Department for Transport told us that anyone that has had the filter removed will now have to a new one put back on their car in order to pass their next MOT test. Ignorance is bliss. What is our view? As a responsible company we want to see emissions reduced. We achieve this every day with specialist fuel modification technologies. Whilst we accept and agree that DPF removal can increase hydrocarbon output it is not always the case. When a customer with a blocked DPF approaches us for help we give them the options, the pros and cons of each, so that they can make an informed decision. In-tank DPF cleaner versus Professional DPF clean versus DPF removal etc. If opting for removal then we advise the use of a combustion catalyst such AR6200 to lower the emissions. The result is lower HCs that before, additional power, improved MPG and no more black smoke from regular regeneration cycles. Unfortunately this choice has now been taken away from the consumer, which is a shame for those that modify emissions control components in a responsible way.

SKB

rde?a je ?ist huda, mene bolj avtomatik moti

dokler jo nebo dobu kir "taprav" u roke

da na goriva sploh ne pomisli?

lepa na pas mater

?alostno ampak resni?no ampak js se ne dam, vztraju bom do konca, pa ?e bo treba bom tut ?ou do njega!

in v tem ti nas preva?a??

pa si se spet mal ?efa po?utu

Angle? se mi je celo odzval, reku sm mu, ?e mi namesto tiste robe lahko po?lje kej drugega, odgovor je bil pozitiven, zej pa upam, da bo res kej iz tega

hja, sam v?asih je bla nafta druga?na kot dons (brez raznoraznih aditivov) druga? pa da? not deci benza na tank pa je ql

lohk pa prpelje? k majstru u na?e konce, ki je ZELO ugoden in dobr pofarba

to je ?koda jest, bolj? je kako pija?ko naredit iz tega

eni si zrihtamo to za en pir

pri teb gre to dvoje dobr skup

tole je pa katastrofa kakega ?upana majo u Dom?alah Helios ? HOPSI POLZELA 73:75 (17:19, 22:19, 18:19, 16:18) (Majstorović 16 (7 skokov), Morina 13; Mulalić 20, Vujasinović 18 (6 skokov, 5 podaj)) Zmago Sagadin, trener Heliosa Dom?al: “Po tekmi ne morem biti zadovoljen. ?e od prve minute smo bili premehki, premalo agresivni in premalo odlo?ni v obrambi, obenem pa presenetljivo nervozni v napadu. S slabo obrambi in skromnim napadom smo Hopsom sami dali mo?nost, da tekmo dobijo. Tudi kon?nico smo odigrali zelo neumno, poklonili nasprotnikom nekaj ?og, ti pa so ta poklon sprejeli in zaslu?eno zmagali. Nih?e vseskozi ne zmaguje in jasno je bilo, da se bo niz enkrat prekinil. Sedaj je va?no le, da ne odnehamo in na naslednjih tekmah igramo bistveno bolje kot do sedaj.” Bo?tjan Kuhar, trener Hopsov Polzele: “Fantje so pustili srce na igri??u. Jagodnik zaradi mo?nega udarca v obraz ni treniral cel teden in danes dihal na ?krge. Znova sta tekmo slabo odigrala Dimec in Va?l, za katera upam, da bosta ?e na naslednji tekmi precej bolj?a. Zadnje tekme tako igramo s petimi, ?estimi igralci. Upam, da se to ?im prej popravi, ?e ne prej januarja, ko se bo vrnil Udrih. Tekma je bila sicer trda. Tak?en kriterij je bolj odgovarjal Heliosu, ki je imel na voljo ve? menjav, a moji fantje so nekako zdr?ali.” potem pa tole na kzs : Dobra organizacija sre?anja s spremljevalnim programom. Zanesljivo opravljeno delo pomo?nih sodnikov. Uradna predstavnika obeh ekip v poro?ilo o tekmi nista zapisala pripomb na organizacijo in izvedbo tekme ter opravljeno delo uradnih oseb. Borbeno in izena?enos re?anje s pove?ano nervozo v vrstah obeh ekip v zadnji ?etrtini, posebej v kon?nici sre?anja. Po zaklju?ku sre?anja ob proslavljanju zmage gostujo?e ekipe vr?ena kovinska posoda za smeti s tribune, na kateri so bili doma?i navija?i. Po zaklju?ku sre?anja vlo?ena disciplinska prijava zoper igralca VUJASINOVI? D. (KD Hopsi Polzela) zaradi tega, ker je po zaklju?ku tekme vrgel ?ogo v smeri ko?a ob izhodu iz dvorane. Ko?a ni zadel, vr?ena ?oga pa je za nekaj centimetrov zgre?ila glavo enega izmed gledalcev. Pri?lo je do besedne komunikacije med igralcem in gledalci, vendar do fizi?nega stika ni pri?lo, prav tako se je igralec ?elel opravi?iti gledalcu. Sklepi: 1. KK HELIOS DOM?ALE se zaradi ne?portnega vedenja gledalcev in vr?enega ve?jega kovinskega predmeta na igri??e kaznuje s kaznijo 250,00 EUR. 2. Igralec VUJASINOVI? D. (KD Hopsi Polzela) se zaradi vlo?ene disicplinske prijave v skladu z 97. ?lenom Tekmovalnih propozicij in Disciplinskih dolo?b tekmovalnih propozicij 13.8.5. kaznuje s prepovedjo nastopa na eni tekmi. Kazen se izvr?i na tekmi 9. kroga. 3. KD HOPSI POLZELA se zaradi ne?portnega vedenja igralca po zaklju?ku tekme kaznuje s kaznijo 100,00 EUR. Komisar lige je o odlo?itvah izdal posseben sklep.

Vrjetno se bolj hudo cuje

Obstaja tut komad na to temo

ni ga bolj?ga zimskega vozila http://www.avto.net/_AVTO/ad.asp?ID=792732...20Golf%20GL%20D

aj u pizdo, zej pa nej tebe pa tvojo Mazdico take stvari ?e namir pustijo

petrol je pa tazadna firma, ki mu dam zaslu?it...

js ns tvojem mestu bi raj?i novga

tut to je res

kaj si ti ja nor, kam smo pr?l s cenam nazadne ko sm bencinca tanku poln kesl je bil benz 100-ka po 1.33?